Wine Sets of the Ungabunga


Restaurant Wine Lists and Retail Wine Sets.

Wine lists are generally organized regionally, varietally, by progression, color coded, by price, or a blend of the bunch. Organizing the retail wine set by varietal could very-well be the future for retail. Currently, this is common in restaurants.

Most of the restaurant lists I’ve helped have been set by varietal (I don’t expect the consumer to be fluent in wine geography) or the progressive, by the body weight of the wine (which I’m not that big a fan of). I believe that both of these options equalize the playing field. Ordering wine from a list can be risky. Taking advice from a waiter or retail wine steward can be, as well. Like a good butcher, your experience and expense might just rely on them.

On the retail side, organization usually reigns in geography, followed by varietal. My question is whether the future of retail wine sets will be organized by varietal. It appeals to the ungabunga side of U.S. shopping. Though not traditional or classic, it’s probably smart.

Pick pinot noir on a restaurant list, for example. Instead of having California pinot noirs separated from other pinot noirs on the list, maybe having California, Burgundy, Oregon, and New Zealand all mixed together under “pinot noir” spreads the wealth. If anything, it tends to hurt California pinot noir sales. It helps Burgundy. It helps Oregon. It helps New Zealand.

A wine list is essential and the presentation is extremely important. It can overwhelm or educate. A good one will sell you wine without much intervention. The current trend on restaurant lists is for more “by varietal”. Retail continues to stay aligned with “by place of origin”. For many consumers the crossover from California Pinot to French Pinot can be a big valley to cross. Some may say that placing all pinot noirs in the same pile dilutes the respect Burgundy deserves. I understand that and mostly agree. But, let the juice speak for itself.

After all, many “by varietals” are actually blends disguised as single varietals.

Let’s pick on “single varietals”, use pinot noir as an example, and consider the differences in wine laws. Notice the following discrepancies in labeling

When a pinot noir is from Burgundy, it must be 100% pinot noir. By law. (wink.wink.)

When a pinot noir is from Oregon, it must be minimum 90% the varietal listed.

When a pinot noir is from the south of France, it must be minimum 85% the varietal listed.

When a pinot noir is from California, it must be minimum 75% the varietal listed.

This means that the remaining percentage can generally be whatever. Syrah anyone?

Sounds dishonest, doesn’t it? Who wins here? It’s a marketing game.

Obviously, education is the key. But, does everyone want to be educated?

More to come, but I’ve got to go right now. J


~ by GoodTasteReport on July 7, 2008.

3 Responses to “Wine Sets of the Ungabunga”

  1. Hi,

    I am writing to you on behalf of Zephyr Wine Adventures and Open Wine Consortium to invite you to attend the first-ever North American Wine Bloggers Conference scheduled for October 24-26 in Sonoma County, California. This conference will be a chance for wine bloggers – those who write about wine or about the wine industry – to meet each other, discuss our impact on the world of wine, and have a great time. We have put together a fantastic conference that includes two dinners, two lunches, educational seminars, a Grand Tasting, a Live Wine Blogging event, keynote speakers including Gary Vaynerchuk and Alice Feiring, and a Vineyard Walk all at a subsidized price of only $95.

    Please see for details and to register. We have limited conference and hotel space, so please don’t wait to reserve your spot.

    Whether you can join us or not, please consider promoting the conference by writing about it on your blog. Please contact me and I will send you a small conference logo for you to use. Also, if you would like to sign up for Zephyr Wine Adventures’ Travels With Wine e-newsletter or join the OpenWine Consortium, please visit and

    Please let me know if you have any questions and I hope to see you at the conference!


    Yael Borofsky

    Zephyr Adventures

  2. I actually like the idea of allowing a winemaker to blend a percentage of other grapes into his wine and still call it by the varietal. If you can make a better Pinot Noir by adding 24% Syrah, why shouldn’t you do so? If it tastes good, people will buy it. And I’m all for that.

    Winemakers bucking tradition is what has given rise to wines such as Super Tuscans. WHere would Spain be today if everyone was still just making old school Tempranillo in Rioja?

    That being said, I appreciate it when a winemaker takes the time to put pertinent information (such as a non-traditional blend) on a back label. I’m all for releasing the best wine possible from your winery; but please let me know if you’re spiking your Pinot Noir with a little bit of something else.

  3. I’m all for blending. It often seems that behind the scenes that many of the “100% varietal” wines aren’t actually so. It all goes back to “laws are for those that need’em” and I’m not sure how that pertains to “ma & pa homemade” versus the strictly pr/label whores. If you can drop coins in the machine and out pops the cup, followed by one spout of powder and another of water… I’m not sure I’m on board. In the end, we just need a “red wine” and a “white wine”. I don’t generally eat Chips Ahoy for a reason. Mostly, I have other options not to and I have the experience to choose not to. The Factory doesn’t do it for me. Wine Plug ‘n Play No Way…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: